web page hit counter
Browse by:
Get daily news round-up
« 'Miss Lucy' butterfly bow sandals at Accessorize | Main | My Favourite Shoes: Liz's gorgeous crystal studded heels »

Cheap or Chic Challenge: Patent wedge MJ's

cheapchictom.jpg
The last cheap or chic challenge showed just how easy it is to be fooled by a bit of colour, with 4 out of ten choosing the left shoe (actually from Steve Madden) as the pricey option, when it was in fact the right shoe that was the Stuart Weitzman offering. This week it might be easier to pick out the designer from the discount (but don't spoil it if you know where they're both from). What amazed me is that they're almost identical apart from the fact that one pair costs well over $500 and the other only $30!

Find the perfect shoes with our sister site OSOYOU.com

Want to watch Fashion TV? Click here for the latest videos

Came straight to this page? Visit www.shoewawa.com for loads more stories!

Posted by Gemma on February 9, 2007 12:33 PM | Comments (4) | digg.gif digg this | delicious.gifdel.icio.us this | stumble.gifStumble It!

Comments

I think the $500 pair is the one on the left. The leather looks like its better quality.

Posted by: Ania | February 9, 2007 1:51 PM

I agree. I like them though :(

Posted by: Julia | February 9, 2007 5:58 PM

I have seen this style of shoe by Christian Louboutin, Nine West, Target and Payless. The styles have been basically identical with only the leather material and the real vs. faux stacked heel being the difference. For a trendy type shoe I would go with the Nine West version because it is fairly inexpensive but won't cut into your feet like the cheaper ones will. However for a shoe you may not wear a lot, go with least expensive option.

Posted by: Poochie | February 9, 2007 10:09 PM

Well, I'm so obsessed with owning the shoes, the originals, I know it's the left ones that are real, because you can see the badly faked wood on the right. I wish I had the cash to own the louboutins, I love them so!

Posted by: lydia | February 13, 2007 3:29 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.