web page hit counter
Browse by:
Get daily news round-up
« Monsoon "Grace" sandals | Main | Urban Outfitters platform shoe-boots »

Yay or Nay Wednesday

yaynay74.jpgIt seems that last week's feather-embellished flats - Kate Spade's 'Dusk' - fell a little flat. Still, 'bird-brained' or not, they certainly won a few fans! If you're keen, you can pick them up for a discounted $159.99 from Bluefly.

This week's offering was actually suggested for 'Ugly Shoe of the Week', but I thought I'd put it to the vote instead! A rather 'different' stiletto / shoe / boot concoction... is it a designer doozie or frightfully foul? Yay or Nay and why?

For more Yay or Nay fun, click here!

Find the perfect shoes with our sister site OSOYOU.com

Want to watch Fashion TV? Click here for the latest videos

Came straight to this page? Visit www.shoewawa.com for loads more stories!

Posted by on March 28, 2007 1:52 PM | Comments (15) | digg.gif digg this | delicious.gifdel.icio.us this | stumble.gifStumble It!

Comments

NAY!

these are frightful indeed! they look really cheap, with teh gold round the heel, are they trying to emulate a horses leg...? they do look quite equistrian to me.

no need for laces and buckles and spats, its just all too much. and the colour, urgh!

Posted by: emmao414 | March 28, 2007 4:23 PM

NAY! They are horrid. It's a crossing of a baseball glove, spats, studs, and a gold spike? I agree with Emmao - equestrian... But it's more Giddy-Yack, than giddy-up!

Posted by: Heidi | March 28, 2007 6:10 PM

I immediately thought of horses too when I saw these. Nay from me 'cos of the colour/gold bits/confusion of styles. This shoe/boot's having an identity crisis.

Posted by: Arnez | March 28, 2007 6:17 PM

I just thought oh my goodness they're hideous NAY!

Posted by: A | March 28, 2007 11:28 PM

Nay. These are just tacky.

Posted by: NikkiH | March 29, 2007 1:04 AM

Can you say "spats"?

Posted by: Mirandacake | March 29, 2007 2:35 AM

Ew no..... just, just no. I bet they're expensive too. Eeesh.

Posted by: Janine | March 29, 2007 8:44 AM

I think we neeed some YAY here!

Not the most elegant shoes I've ever seen, but very special and unique. I want them :)

Posted by: Morgan le Fay | March 29, 2007 11:18 AM

Really horrible but I bet someone buys them. What I can't understand is a designer sitting there thinking 'ooh these are so fab - can't wait to make them so I can wear them!!!' - maybe they were made by a computer programme as they seem to a bit of everything in them!

Posted by: Deborah Price | March 29, 2007 11:20 AM

YAY, because they are special and diverge from the common denominator. That is, they do not bore me. A legwarmer wrapped around the shoe! That's genious, makes me think of 1940's men's shoes. I want to see more shoes with legwarmers!

Posted by: Divina | March 29, 2007 11:33 AM

Yay for me, I love this type of shoe, with a slit between the boot part and the stiletto part! I've seen such models by Dior/Galliano and I think they're very sexy

Posted by: Jackbun | March 29, 2007 12:32 PM

Nay. There's too much going on with this shoe.

Posted by: Melanie | March 29, 2007 3:17 PM

I think that detail on the top would look nice on a boot of the same color. As they are, I think they'd make my feet look stubby and distract from the rest of me. Nay.

Posted by: Jael | March 29, 2007 4:22 PM

Too much. It just looks vulgar. Nay!

Posted by: Natalia | March 29, 2007 8:03 PM

Nay. The canvas spat has no place with a gold trimmed stiletto. And if that's not canvas it sure does a good impression of it.

Posted by: Tephra | March 29, 2007 10:05 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.