What's worse? An ugly pair of shoes or an even uglier bag?

Baby%20splat.jpg Bag%20ug.jpg

My friend Molly and I have a regular argument about which is worse; an ugly bag or an even fuglier pair of shoes. I see her point when it comes to an unsightly handbag, it's enough to break your heart, but at least you can customise a dreaded looking tote...there's nowt much you can do with a weird looking pair of shoes. So I put her to the 'rock and a hard place test', you know, if you had to choose between a naked Jeremy Clarkson or George Clooney with a cold sore who would you kiss? Only this time I did it with shoes and a handbag. So if your life depended on wearing one of these to complete an outfit, which would you choose? The Baby Phat 'Kim Cork Medallion' wedges or the Cynthia Rowley Crossbody Fur Bag? Me personally I'd still go for the bag, coyote flap and all, and that's saying something!

Baby Phat | Cynthia Rowley's 'Ginny'

What's worse? An ugly pair of shoes or an even uglier bag? - Comments

  • Jael

    You are cruel! I refuse to answer this question or my fashion sense may abandon me.

  • Becky

    Id go for the shoes....

    As everyone has already said its pretty easy to hide the shoes...

    the bag... theres just no escaping from...

    *shudders*

    xXx

  • Jimena

    shoes. i'm against fur industry.

  • Wellesley

    I work at macy's in the U.S., have sold those shoes and can say the are not nearly as hideous in person. They actually sell very well.

  • Niki

    oh definitely the shoes! with extremely wide legged pants!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Came straight to this page? Visit Shoewawa for loads more stories!